STEPHEN VOLK
Flashback: This Is Horror (Jan 2012)21/12/2023 When you think of British supernatural television, Stephen Volk will always spring to mind. He is, without a doubt, one of the Godfathers of British horror screenwriting. Amongst his classics is Ken Russell’s Gothic, although he is perhaps best known for the creation of two cult television programmes, Afterlife and the sublime Ghostwatch. Jim Mcleod was fortunate enough to sit down with Stephen recently.
Hello Stephen, it’s an honour and a pleasure to get the chance to talk to you again. How are things with you? SV: Not bad, though times are tough, as everybody knows. The cuts mean that everybody is totally risk-averse at the moment, so getting any decision made is murder. After several months of writing treatments, though, I have a script commission, possibly two. And a rewrite on an older project of mine in which there’s some new interest. So I’m suddenly busy. Also hoping that some cash will come in, which would be nice. So who exactly is Stephen Volk? SV: If I knew that I wouldn’t need to be a writer! How did you get into screenwriting? SV: I drew pictures and wrote as a kid growing up in South Wales. I went to art school. I went to film school, but I also wrote stories the whole time. I felt I was a split personality between the visual and the verbal until a tutor at film school called Bill Stair (who was both a writer and art director, and worked a lot with director John Boorman) told me, no – you’re a writer, but a screenwriter. It was the first time anybody had pointed that out to me! I loved cinema and I wanted to write stories as if I was watching them, so that’s what I did, and I did it right through my first job which was in advertising, writing at night time, sending scripts off, getting them back, sending them off again. For ten years I did that, until somebody optioned my screenplay Gothic for about one and a half peanuts, then I got an agent and my agent sold it to Virgin Films. But I had several other screenplays written by then. Nowadays there might be a more formal route of going to film school to be a screenwriter on a Screenwriting course, but it was more haphazard for me back in the 1970s. So Gothic was my first screen credit in 1986 with Ken Russell (RIP) directing. How does screenwriting differ to writing prose? SV: A good prose writer can learn screenwriting, and vice versa. Writing is writing. It’s about using your imagination and knowledge of human beings, and the ability to convey ideas and edit them when you’ve got them. Writing a screenplay, though, you have to be immensely concise, to the bone really, and always be the camera and the microphone: if you can’t see it or hear it don’t write it down in the scene. The real skill is in cutting. You have to be conscious of the ticking clock, how long a scene runs, and it has to be 100 pages or 100 minutes or you are dead. And it’s not description, it’s incident. Things have to happen. So the real skill is in cutting, cutting, cutting because less is more and the narrative of film is merciless – you can’t divert into tributaries as you can in a novel. Point of view and a strong line of action is vitally important. But with all writing the main thing is theme and metaphor. As Paul Schrader said, his theme in Taxi Driver was loneliness and his metaphor for the theme was the taxi driver. (But you needn’t know that when you start writing. You might not discover your theme until draft eight.) On the other hand, what I love about short story writing (apart from the fact it can be done in days rather than years!) is that you can get in the head space and just let it flow with the voice in your head and the language. And nobody tells you what to do! You predominantly write in the supernatural genre. What is the appeal of genre for you? SV: John Ford’s chosen milieu was Westerns. Even when they weren’t set in the Wild West, they were set in Galway or something, they were still Westerns in mentality. Similarly, I think there’s something about the supernatural tales I grew up reading and watching that just chimed with me and I wanted to be in that world. Primarily they were thrilling. I loved the idea of something unlikely or impossible added to a story, not just it being about mundane reality, and the fact that that unnatural element you introduce isn’t just window dressing but it illuminates theme and character: it enables the story to be something it otherwise wouldn’t be. I think generally I like “cinema of the imagination” rather than social realism (which I find formulaic and unrewarding), but specifically supernatural or ghost stories can be great metaphors for grief, hurt, the past… It’s a wonderful playground and the territory just always attracts me. Plus, I believe we are all a mixture of the rational and irrational urges, these two things battling, wanting to believe but terrified if these things are true, so I think it’s our essential nature you can sometimes dramatise. People are perhaps most familiar with you from Ghostwatch. Do you ever feel like saying there is more to me than Ghostwatch? I’ve always wondered if writers ever feel the same way as bands getting asked to play the same song over and over. SV: I suppose I do, but I don’t mind that people remember it twenty years later! At the time, 1992, it was like it happened overnight (literally) and there was this angry flurry of protest in the media and it was gone. I thought really it was the kind of event if I had been back in school I would have loved, and it seems that was the way it hit a lot of people, or so I’ve heard since. I’ve done other things. I’ve written about six feature films now. You don’t know if they’re going to work or find an audience. In fact you’re often disappointed in them yourself, but the main thing you hope for is a pay day that enables you to keep on writing. And if you can keep writing you might get lucky: that’s it. If people only know me from Ghostwatch they will wonder what the hell I’ve been doing since 1992 but the reality is I haven’t stopped! So I keep writing and on and off things happen, like Shockers or Octane or Superstition. But I wrote and created the ITV series Afterlife which ran for two seasons starring Lesley Sharp and Andrew Lincoln. That was fairly well liked, I think, and I’m pleased about that, and The Awakening is just out with a reasonably high profile push behind it from StudioCanal. If people only know me from Ghostwatch they will wonder what the hell I’ve been doing since 1992 but the reality is I haven’t stopped! 2012 marks the twentieth anniversary of Ghostwatch, are there any plans to mark this occasion? SV: Not that I know of. I’d like a special edition DVD to come out, one containing maybe an extra disk of proper interviews with the participants and a proper documentary about what happened, but that is pie in the sky at this stage unfortunately, though the material all exists. I have a feeling if anything at all happens beyond a raft of individual screenings up and down the country it will be a last minute “kick-bollock-and-scramble” thing by the BBC or something, typically. Or nothing. We’ll see. I don’t have any control over it. Looking back at the intervening years, how well do you think it stands up? SV: I look at it a lot with audiences and it stands up OK. Listen, after 20 years I’m not going to pick holes in it: it is what it is. It’s a bit dated, but if people have any sense at all, they’ll forgive it for that. You get a lot of giggles when you show it nowadays of course. People think they’re smart. But it always gets a great round of applause at the end. I sense that people enjoy it. The audience is often a 50-50 split of those who’ve seen if before and those who haven’t and it’s always a bit of an occasion. It’s great. You have to remind them of the context of the time though, way back when we made it. That this was at the very beginning of ‘reality TV’ – way before Blair Witch or Most Haunted. And how much influence do you think it has had? SV: Well, exactly that! The whole ‘camcorder horror’ style of drama, which you can trace right to Paranormal Activity – and we know the director of that had been influenced by Ghostwatch because he said so. We invented the night vision stuff that Most Haunted and a hundred other shows have just run into the ground. But Ghostwatch wasn’t Most Haunted, which is a crass, idiotic pseudo-spiritualistic entertainment show – Ghostwatch was a drama designed to provoke you and get you to think about your complicity in the TV shows you watch, get you to think about how you take information on your screens for granted, think about how you don’t question experts, about how you need to question even what you see with your own eyes… Have you ever been tempted to return to the format and do a sequel? SV: No. People ask, but it’s a one-off. Though somebody asked me for a story on the tenth anniversary and I wrote a sequel in short story form, which was nominated for a Horror Writers Association Bram Stoker Award. It’s in my short story collection Dark Corners (Gray Friar Press) if anybody wants to read it. How does writing for television, differ to writing for films? SV: The actual writing is the same. The process and the industry is entirely different. In movies the director is king so once a director is on board you can be fired, and he can rewrite you and the producer doesn’t give a shit about you any more because it’s all about the director. In television, it’s the writer and producer that work on the script and get the commission, and it’s not until it gets a green light that the director is hired. So the producer and writer are already a team and the director fits in. The writer will not get fired and the director has to listen. Bollocks to his ‘vision’. There’s nothing more harmful to the quality of feature films being made than the ridiculous pedestal that directors get put on as if their words are gold. It should be an equal playing field like it is in television and there shouldn’t be the feeling you could be fired as a writer on the slightest whim even when you’ve created a project and been writing it for maybe fifteen years, thirty drafts or whatever. But they don’t care because a lot of the time producers don’t know the difference between a good script and a bad one: they just want to get it made. The money on movies is better but as it says on Sh*t My Dad Says, “screenwriting is like riding on a merry-go-round where the horse is trying to fuck you.” So how thick skinned are you? I would imagine that unlike writing novels, where the only other input is your editor, screenwriting has lots of different people poking and prodding your baby? SV: Just picture that and multiply it by a hundred and you might be close to the reality. It’s horrendous, because nobody knows anything and you can’t listen to everybody and you can’t listen to nobody. A writer might be happy typing THE END on page 110 of his new script, but they haven’t become a screenwriter until they’ve wrestled with development notes on a project for at least ten years. That’s what separates the men from the boys. It’s absolutely gruelling. The truth is I don’t want to get a ‘thick skin’ because a thick skin means you don’t care, but you have to develop the intellectual muscles to get through the collaborative process without imploding. After over 20 years in the business, I suppose you get better at negotiating it, but still, every single time I get notes or go to a meeting my stomach is in knots because you are thinking, literally, “Is this the meeting where it all gets fucked up?” Have you ever walked away from a project because of a difference of opinion? SV: Yes. Well, not merely “a difference of opinion”. It has to be much more than that! I left The Guardian, a film I was working on with The Exorcist director William Friedkin, for a variety of reasons: mainly, I couldn’t read his mind and he wanted me to write what was in his head and only he could do that. (The full story of what happened on that picture I tell on the extras on The Guardian DVD re-release, which is out now.) The other film I didn’t continue on was adapting The Box of Delights for Mike Newell. I’d written about four drafts and Newell was too busy to meet for even ten minutes to discuss where we were at, so there seemed to be no point in doing more drafts as far as I could see it. Sometimes you have given all you can, and life is too short. My US agent always used to have the philosophy, stay on in there till you get fired, which I’ve never understood. I’ve always thought honesty is the best policy and, yes be loyal to the absolute point of professionalism as long as you can, but if it isn’t working and you can’t give it your best any more, and you are torturing your own work, get out of there before it kills you. Because sometimes it does kill you. One thing I have never understood is how far down the ladder of fame a scriptwriter is. Ask anyone to name their three favourite actors or directors and they could rattle them off no problem. However if you ask someone to name their three favourite screenwriters, most folks would be hard pushed. Do you ever get hacked off by this? The way I see it you can’t make a silk purse out of a pig’s ear. And the foundation of a good film is its script. Or am I being silly? SV: Why would that be silly? No. In theatre everybody says Arthur Miller is the author in his play. TV writers are the author of their dramas. Why not in film? It’s entirely political and it is all to do with power and nothing to do with creativity or efficiency. The silly ‘auteur’ system (which was appropriate in France because France was creating writer-directors) was entirely stupid applied to Hollywood. Yet somehow the cult or the director arose as a marketing tool. And it won’t go away because now even a first-time director will have the credit ‘A Film By’ – something a genius like Billy Wilder never asked for! He always said “Isn’t director enough?” Quite right! The truth is film culture, aided by the likes of Sight & Sound magazine, really want the director to be the author of the film. Why? Because it makes the critic’s life easier! The fact that it’s totally inaccurate to how most movies are made is irrelevant to them! This is the reason many screenwriters are bitter, aside from the fact that they have to sit in the room with some very dim directors and some very stupid producers. I know one thing. If writers had ALL the power instead of NONE, there wouldn’t be a larger number of bad films made. I’ve several times asked people to pay attention to the writer of a film they enjoyed. Whether they do or not I don’t know. I think they’re just brainwashed into thinking the director does everything. Except the dialogue, maybe. (Though they probably think the actors make that up most of the time, too!) Looking back at your past screenwriting accomplishments, which has been the most rewarding for you and why? SV: I enjoyed the experience of The Deadness of Dad which was a short film that won a BAFTA award for me. I wasn’t commissioned, I wasn’t paid a penny, I just wrote it. The director was terrific. It started as a neat little dark concept but she saw the potential for something moving and deeper, and I’m so glad it went in that direction because I realised that’s what I want in my writing – I want genre (in this case a kind of magical realism) to produce emotion, maybe surprisingly so, because people don’t always expect to be moved by supernatural of scary stories. The other hugely rewarding experience was working on Afterlife, my TV series because, not only was the result really close to what I wrote on the page, but the whole process was collaborative and involving: I was there every step of the way, working with the director and actors on a day by day basis. That’s the way it should be, but often it isn’t, I don’t know why. The producer on Afterlife, Murray Ferguson, is the best I’ve ever worked with. This year has seen the release of your latest screenwriting opus The Awakening. Can you tell us how you came up with the idea? Were you commissioned to write it, or did you write it and then shop it around? SV: The Interpretation of Ghosts (as it used to be called) came about in the late 90s when I took a stint as a screenwriting tutor and showed my students the brilliant 1960s film The Innocents based on Henry James’s Turn of the Screw. It gave me the idea of a female ghost hunter in a haunted house surrounded by her retro paraphernalia, but also the story of the ghost she encounters. I wrote several treatments and took it to various producers. It changed a lot over the years, took on many forms. It was originally set in Victorian times because it was in many ways about repression (repressed memory, repressed sexuality) and because I had this image of women in black dresses, like in The Piano. After several years BBC Films liked it enough to commission a script and that went through various drafts. Origin Pictures got involved and they began searching for a director, it was updated to the 1920s, and the Dominic West and Imelda Staunton characters were introduced and it became what was filmed, more or less. There are two other versions of the script, one set in France, and one which is a direct sequel to Turn of the Screw, can you tell us about those? SV: Not just two – lots. SPOILER ALERT: As I say, we watched The Innocents and there’s a point where the little girl, Flora, leaves the house, Bly, and we never see her again. I thought: what happened to Flora? What if she grew up and blanked out all her horrible memories of the ghosts at Bly (Quint and Miss Jessel). More interestingly, what if as an adult she became rabidly sceptical about ghosts, not realising the truth of her own past because she’s shut it away in denial? That became fascinating: the idea of using repressed memory in a ghost story, so that when she returns to the house (now a school) she doesn’t even recognise it, and the process of the story is her recovering those traumatic memories. That was the essential idea we retained throughout all the drafts. One, briefly, was set in Paris with Sigmund Freud as a young doctor, but it seemed a very English ghost story at its core. Eventually we felt we had to delete the direct references to Turn of the Screw and create our own back-story, but I still think it has the ‘echo’ of that book and film: ‘Flora’ becoming ‘Florence’ is still there in the name of the main character as a nice reminder. Do you think the correct version was made? SV: I think the final film is an excellent film and director Nick Murphy did a wonderful job in terms of the visuals and the atmosphere, and of course the performances. But it’s not really the film I started off wanting to see, by any means. BBC Films were all worried about ‘the Cranford effect’ of bonnets and such like, but I would like to have seen the version set in Victorian times, as I say, because the theme was repression and to me that is the setting that reflects that theme: in clothes, manners, in speech. It had a deeper sexual undercurrent and a social subtext, originally. Someone once said a ghost story has to be either Freudian or Marxist and I think it was actually both, before a director came on board. I also think it had a simpler and more emotional back story and, in one version anyway, an extremely shattering final scene, the like of which I’ve never seen in a ghost story or a horror film. I think it would have been very memorable, but of course I’ll never know. Also it’s possible I am wrong and the version that was made was the best possible version. It’s entirely subjective. What would you say are the main themes of the film? Are you trying to put a message across? SV: I don’t like the word message or meaning really, but obviously there is a dramatic reason that underpins a story or makes it a story you want to write. But to answer your question as best I can: beware that you may be covering up your true nature or the truth about your own identity. The hubris of science. Pride cometh before a fall. Don’t think you know all the answers (even about yourself) because you don’t. More than anything, don’t cut yourself off from what you feel: trust your feelings and the journey it takes you on. Nick Murphy felt very much that the film was about ‘people see the ghosts they need to’ and that was his one-liner. I’m very much of the opinion that ghost stories are not about the ghost but the person that sees the ghost: they are projections of the person’s flaw that has to be put right, in whatever real or symbolic way. You said elsewhere that the characters in the film drive the story forward rather than the mystery. Was this always your intention? SV: Without being too highfalutin, the characters have to enable the story to happen. For me, the characters don’t come first, the story idea comes first, then you construct the character or characters in order for the story to plausibly happen. If you just take some formulaic teenager from a million other movies, what is the point? The thing is, with genre, the character has to be specific enough to feel real but universal enough to identify with. That’s the balance. As for mystery, I really hate constructing mystery stories: the placing the clues, the red herrings, the reveal, and it is usually the place where most ghost stories, like What Lies Beneath, fall apart disastrously (even The Ring: who is interested in who committed the crime? Nobody!). Ghost stories appeal to the sense of mystery and enigma and the uncanny: nobody wants the solution, really. But, then again, you give them nothing, they’re still not happy! There seems to be a growing interest in this sort of film, why do you think this is the case? SV: I’m very sceptical about the thesis that these things come in and out of fashion. Yes, The Awakening is being released shortly before Hammer’s remake of The Woman in Black, but hang on, I wrote it about thirteen years ago! It could have been made at any point in that thirteen year period. It could have pre-dated The Orphanage, The Devil’s Backbone, The Others or even The Sixth Sense. So fashion is largely arbitrary. I get very tired of lazy newspaper articles about vampires suddenly being in fashion again (with Twilight): the fact is, vampires never go away, they are taking new story forms all the time. And ghost stories are always around. There are times, like the ‘90s when they are unfashionable because it was all teenagers and slashers and Scream, and that’s all that could be financed, and at the time I said, “This won’t last. Audiences are going to say, OK, I get it; now really scare me”: and they did. And then there was The Sixth Sense. Which, thank God, went back to first principles and treated the audience intelligently. So what do you think of the final film? SV: I am really proud that The Awakening is beautifully made and has fantastic performances from Rebecca Hall and Dominic West, one of my favourite actors at the moment: he is perfectly cast and brings a lot to the story. What I most like is that it is set in summer but it is summer tinged with sickness and that reflects the idea of a country in mourning, traumatised by death. Nick knew exactly what film he was making and pulled it off. Can you tell us of any future projects? SV: I have a fairly outrageous story called ‘Celebrity Frankenstein’ coming out in an anthology called Exotic Gothic 4 in March (PS Publishing), and another story, ‘White Butterflies’, is in PS’s book of weird Western stories, Gutshot. I’m back working on some scripts right now, the pilots for two different TV series I can’t really give you any details about at this stage, but a press release is going out soon on one of them, I’ve just heard. Also I have a couple of new spec screenplays doing the rounds of production companies, including Playtime, which I wrote with my good pal Tim Lebbon, and a very challenging piece of work, Sgt Bertrand. People are having difficulty with the subject matter of that one, but that’s how I like it. It’s provocative in the extreme. What’s the point of writing stuff that isn’t? I possibly think it’s my best bit of writing to date. We’ll see. The point is, you’ve got to get it made and that’s the struggle. Stephen, thank you so much for taking the time to talk to me once again, as always it has been, enlightening, enjoyable, and above all an honour - JIM MCLEOD
0 Comments
Ginger Nuts of Horror: The author and screenwriter spills all on his chilling new collection, The Good Unknown and Other Ghost Stories.
An exclusive interview with Kit Power as they dive into the bone-chilling inspiration and creative process behind the book. A podcast for anyone who ever dreamed of being a writer... then went and put the kettle on.
Jon Rand, Tom Turner and Dave Baird are self-confessed "failing writers". Join them as they stumble towards their shared ambition: to become proper writers. Cringe at their poetry. Cheer as they compete in writing challenges. Gasp as they ask bestselling authors and BAFTA-winning writers all the questions no-one else dares. As they say - just prepare for raw, undiluted failure... Click here to hear Writing Ghost Stories with Stephen Volk and Ciaran O'Keefe "With the help of two expert spookologists: Stephen Volk - horror writer & mastermind behind the BBCs infamous Ghostwatch, and Dr Ciaran O'Keeffe - famed ghostbuster and parapsychologist, we're attempting to figure out what gives us the heebie jeebies, so that we can all go away and write the world's GREATEST EVER GHOST STORY. "That invitation extends to you too, listeners! We want your submissions for our Traditional Ghost Story Christmas Special later in the year. So get writing - and hopefully we can all sit down round the fire and share a little anthology of all our spooky stories in December." failingwriterspodcast.com/blog "The Night Frankenstein Was Born"24/8/2023 A 29-minute interview with Selina Packard about the making of Gothic for the Open University's OpenLearn site. "Screenwriter Stephen Volk talks to Selina Packard about his script for the 1986 film Gothic, about working with director Ken Russell, about the evolution of the Frankenstein myth and its place in the British horror genre, and also about the politics of being a writer, both in the early 19th and early 21st centuries."
Afterimages is a podcast for cinephiles that takes a deep dive into moving images. Each episode features a special guest who is invited to explore a film of their choice with your hosts, film writers Franck Boulègue and Marisa C. Hayes.
They say: "Travel with us to wintery Venice for some chilling scares during your summer holidays as a way to beat the heat! Here's our eighth episode about Nicolas Roeg's Don't Look Now, with our guest Stephen Volk." [Use the links to listen via Spotify or Amazon music] [text also available but beware of numerous typos] This month (May 2023) the HWA is Celebrating Our Elders. Each day we'll share an interview from the Horror Writers Association blog.
Read the interview with Stephen Volk here or read below: Did you start out writing or working in the horror field, and if so why? If not, what were you writing initially and what compelled you to move into horror? It would be tempting to say I’ve always been interested in the horror genre, but I think as a reader and writer your focus develops over time. Your genre, in some ways, chooses you, and I think those who gravitate to horror are drawn to it because they see fear all around them and the horror form gives them a way to deal with it in symbolic terms. Alfred Hitchcock was once asked “Mr Hitchcock, as the master of screen terror, what frightens you?” Hitch answered “Everything!” That’s me to a tee. I grew up in the South Wales town of Pontypridd in the 1960s, spending my pocket money on Famous Monsters of Filmland magazine, Marvel Classics, and the Pan and Fontana books of horror and ghost stories, but I always had an equal obsession with the cinema and TV and glutted myself on the fare of fantasy shows of that era. I also consumed a lot of fantasy and science fiction books, became a voracious consumer of Moorcock and Ballard, but had the erroneous urge as I reached adulthood to be a writer of “serious fiction” – that is to say, fiction that people took seriously. Happily the phase soon passed. The British screenwriter Nigel Kneale taught me that if you are drawn to a genre, and it chimes with you, then embrace it: your only obligation is to write it to the best of your capacity. With subtlety, commitment and intelligence. And never, ever to look down on the audience. Who were your influences as a writer when you started out and who, if anyone, continues to influence you? A big influence was British novelist Dennis Wheatley, who is largely forgotten now but in the 1960s of my childhood he was really the equivalent of Stephen King, with countless best sellers about Satanism, starting with the classic The Devil Rides Out (brilliantly filmed by Hammer starring Christopher Lee). Now fallen out of favour for his rather turgid writing style and non-PC politics, he was responsible, some might say, at least in part, for the “occult explosion” of the sixties which led to Rosemary’s Baby and The Exorcist. For all his faults, as he was my gateway drug to horror, I found myself writing about Wheatley as a fictional character in “Netherwood”, one of my stories in The Dark Masters Trilogy. The other writers I always mention in this regard are Richard Matheson and Robert Bloch, because they did this marvellous thing which was magical to me: I saw their names on book covers AND I saw their names on movies. From The Incredible Shrinking Man to I Am Legend, from the Corman Poe films to Psycho, from Star Trek to The Twilight Zone. You can imagine, to a 12-year-old kid in the Welsh Valleys this was mind-boggling. But there must be something of the Protestant work ethic in my DNA because, when I saw the “created by” or “screenplay by” credit on screen, I thought secretly: “Well, someone has to do that. If I work hard, maybe it could be me.” Never ever dreaming in reality I would ever do it for a living. As for current influences, new voices blow me away every day – too numerous to mention. Ally Wilkes (I’ve just finished her phenomenal novel All The White Spaces), Benjamin Myers, Stephen Gallagher, Graeme McRae Burnet, Mariana Enriquez, Emma Donoghue, Patrick McGrath, Flannery O’Connor, Maupassant! Some of them not “new” but always ripe for rediscovery! How have the changes in horror publishing over the past decades affected you? To be honest, I have largely not been a part of it. I met an agent early on, when I first moved to London after art school, who told me I was spreading myself too thin. I’d been writing all sorts of things – radio plays, bits of a novel, short stories, scripts. He said I should choose one discipline to concentrate on, I couldn’t be jack of all trades because I’d be master of none. What did I really want to write? Put on the spot, I said “Screenplays”: which might or might not have been the right decision at the time. So, I was not really affected by the publishing “horror boom” in the 1980s because I was writing films. Unless I was part of it amongst Dream Demon, Hellraiser and Company of Wolves. My first produced feature was Gothic, directed by Ken Russell (1986), which starred Natasha Richardson as Mary Shelley and Gabriel Byrne as Byron, followed by others including Universal’s The Guardian (William Friedkin, 1990), then Ghostwatch (1992), right up to The Awakening (2011) starring Rebecca Hall, and a bunch of stuff before and since. Screenplays were my main career, in the US and UK, but I always loved novels, especially horror novels. I just hadn’t gone down the route of writing them. It was hard enough to crack open the door to the film industry. My first dipping of the toe into publishing in the late ‘90s was through Darren Floyd, who had organized a small “Con” in Cardiff. It was there I met a friendly group of other horror and affiliated writers (including Tim Lebbon and Ramsey Campbell, who was being interviewed). This was the first time, to my astonishment, I found out there was a market for short fiction and horror short fiction at that! I thought horror publishing was dead except for the behemoths like King and Herbert, but here were young, enthusiastic publishers like Gary Fry and Chris Teague and there were readers and fans. And the idea of putting stories out into that market was thrilling, not least because, for the most part, as I found out, they REMAINED the stories I wrote. They didn’t get fucked up along the way! So I was hooked and have been ever since. Today, the work I do for print is at least as important as the work I do for the screen. Maybe more so. I think I’ve become a better writer because of it, and many times it has reconnected me with my core values after a bruising experience in “showbiz”. So, far from being a side hustle, it’s very much a parallel career now. It’s vitally important to me, and I’m deeply thankful to the publishers and editors who have got me there, most notably the marvellous Peter and Nicky Crowther of PS Publishing. I get massive, intrusive commercial pressure in my day job, so I feel blessed to have more control with my fiction. It’s a welcome change, and a necessary palliative to the soul. Do you think you’ve encountered ageism? If so, how do you counteract or deal with it? I do think there’s ageism in the film/TV industry because the obvious fetish is for new names. People want to dream big, be the great discoverer. Inevitably, over time, as a writer you become familiar to them, and I’m sure there’s a sense of: “Oh, him. We know that guy.” And they’re less excited for the very reason that they know you. There’s a terrible story in This Is Not A Pity Memoir by screenwriter Abi Morgan, where she is undergoing cancer treatment and having to deal with her husband being in a coma, and she goes into a café in Shepherd’s Bush and hears two people from BBC Drama discussing her, saying, “Oh, Abi Morgan, everyone says she’s over the hill now.” And I read that and thought My fuck: they are saying that about Abi Morgan! (The award winning writer of The Hour, Brick Lane, The Iron Lady, Shame, Suffragette.) What bloody chance have I got? I don’t know what you can do to counteract it exactly except to be aware of the changing world around you and the changing market. It’s no good writing like you always used to and expecting it to fly. Make sure you work is – and I hesitate now – “relevant”. Oh, how I hate that word! I received a brief the other day from a commissioner looking for genre ideas that were “zeitgeisty and relevant”: I replied to the producer, sarcastically, that I was sorry but I only had irrelevant ideas at the moment. I mean, honestly. The idea that writers go around writing ideas that are not relevant is so insulting! The truth is, if you think about ageism, you’d curl up your toes and die. You’ve got to believe it’s about the work, and if the work is good they’ll notice. That’s a lie, I know. But what alternative do you have? You’ve got to live that lie or simply accept that your time has passed and there’s nothing you can do about it. Like the scene with Brad Pitt’s character in Babylon where he hears the audience sniggering at his performance. I could hardly watch that scene. He has to live with it… or what? You can yell fuck ‘em into the void. That’s what I do. But mostly I try to ignore it because there’s nothing you can do except try to prove them wrong in their prejudice. What do you wish you knew when you were just getting into the field? When you are young (and I was no exception), you have this illusion that, if you have talent and luck, you get to a certain age as a writer and “make it” – that everyone will want you, sign checks, your career will go stratospheric and you will have no more worries, financial or creative for the rest of your life. But that is the exception, not the rule. For most writers it is a case of lurching from one project to the next, stepping over the debris of failures and tossing a new spinning plate in the air. The vast majority of my writer friends agree: there is no sweet spot where it’s suddenly easy. It never was, and if anything it’s even harder now. I don’t know how young writers will survive in a world where nobody wants to pay for anything. But they will. They always do. They’ll thrive and be brilliant. Do you have any advice for writers just starting out? I always keep it real simple. Don’t chase fashion and don’t chase money. Money will come when you get good. Concentrate on finding your voice and there’s no magic trick to that except read the books that excite you and watch the movies you like: if you love it, unpick it, try to figure out how that worked – what the writer did in that scene, what the actor did. Feed yourself that way but put your ear to the ground and listen to your own heart. Do you think older characters are represented fairly and honestly in horror fiction? Yes and no. The great Steve Rasnic Tem, who springs to mind immediately, does it brilliantly and consistently, as do others. Despite getting older, I try NOT to confine myself to only writing from the POV of a character my age. (When I wrote about Peter Cushing as an old man in my novella “Whitstable” it never occurred to me he was younger than I was. The character I identified with was the frightened little boy.) Although I’m particularly proud of a story called “Orr” in my latest collection, Lies of Tenderness. It’s about an elderly guy who has lost his wife and he has the peculiar gift of having been struck by lightning nineteen times. I have no idea where the idea came from but it evolved into something about mortality and the question of how we choose to live our lives. I liked how it turned out and there it is. Maybe it is related to COVID. I wrote another story in the same collection called “Bad Language” which is about my mother’s dementia and her death. It was painful to write (right down to the details of her funeral) but I felt duty bound to be honest. Emotional honesty is one of the most important ingredients in horror. On the other hand, there have been a rash of films in which the “old” are demonized for no particular reason. The idea of ageing somehow conflating with monstrousness. I’m thinking of The Visit, Relic, Old, and X. Full disclosure: I’m not greatly impressed by American culture’s disgust at the ageing process, particularly as regards women. To me it’s cruel, neurotic and deeply immature. (But perhaps that makes it the ideal subject for horror?) What are some of your favorite portrayals of older characters? I loved Ian McKellen in Gods and Monsters, and in Mr Holmes, both wonderful. Karloff in Targets, oh my God… and both Karloff and Catherine Lacey in Michael Reeves’s The Sorcerors. I always liked fellow Welshman Anthony Hopkins in the film, Hearts in Atlantis. I loved little touches like him cleaning his shoes. Apparently Hopkins remembered his father doing that, and I remember my father doing things I now do – which is troubling. Hopkins was of course astounding in The Father, the recent film about Alzheimer’s. I found the film utterly devastating. No doubt partly due to my seeing my mother go through a similar process of losing her sense of reality, and her memory eroding until finally there was nothing left. You might say, The Father is not a “horror” film. I would say I can’t think of a more horrific experience than watching it. Heartbreaking and unforgettable. Do you have anything you’d like to add that we haven’t asked? I’m tired of the lazy presumption that people get more set in their ways and right wing as they get older. Yes it might be true of some writers who cling to the mores of a lost world, and feel threatened by change, which is sad, but that is not a catch-all for writers of a certain age and I resent that implication. If anything I am far more left wing and radical now (as a person and a writer) than I ever was when I was younger. So I’d like to knock that prejudice on the head. It’s not only young writers who want to rattle cages and shake people out of their complacency. That’s, after all, what horror is for. But I have to say, as I get older – and I’ve been making a living as a writer for over 40 years – I’m more and more conscious of a sense of time wasted. In his new novel The Shards, which I started reading last night, Bret Easton Ellis (or the character named “Bret”) talks about not writing screenplays any more, stopping “chasing that game” which he says was a decade of “being well compensated for TV Pilots and screenplays for movies that mostly never got made” – then he says that the book he is writing is “beckoning” to him. I know the feeling. When I came off my first produced movie in 1986 I met with a exec at Tri-Star. He pitched me an idea and I bit his hand off: yes, I can do it, of course I’d write it. My first studio gig. I was hungry. For a living. For a career. To get noticed. Now, 30+ years later, other things matter. I remember reading an interview with Anthony Minghella on the set of Cold Mountain and he was asked why he focused on adaptations rather than original work. His answer was “Time.” He said he figured he only had time for another seven, eight movies and adapting books saved time. Tragically, he didn’t even have the time he thought. Which is why the story sticks in my mind. So, at the age of 68, I find myself being picky. I might not take on something like that Tri-Star gig (which was a shitty idea anyway, and turned into a terrible movie): I might, I don’t know. I’d weigh it up. More important things “beckon”. I’m writing a novel. You could call it my first. (“Netherwood” was over 60,000 words but part of the Dark Masters Trilogy; and Gothic was a novelisation.) I first worked on it thirty years ago and it won’t go away and now I’m 112,000 words in. Wish me luck. I just don’t want on my headstone “He never finished that goddamned book”. It’s got to be done. And I’m as excited about it, at 68, as I ever was about anything. To the point of not wanting to think of much else. But that’s good. As the great director of Don’t Look Now, Nic Roeg, once said: “What is the point of life, but being continually obsessed?” I once read an extraordinary short story by A. S. Byatt called “The July Ghost” (from Sugar and Other Stories, 1987). It describes a man, an academic writing a paper on Hardy’s poems, who, sitting in a summer garden at his lodgings, finds he has a ten year old boy as a companion. When he describes this young boy to the woman from whom he has rented his room, she tells him—unable to see the ghost herself—that it was her only child, killed two years earlier, knocked down by a car on a hot July afternoon.
Aside from additional poignancy that comes with knowing Byatt’s own son died this way, so imbuing the weight of personal experience to the writing, the story, for me, presented an aching, almost unbearable, contradiction and dynamic, one that certainly influenced the creative process when I was developing Afterlife, my ITV drama series (2005-6)—which I always paraphrased as being about a troubled psychic medium and the even more troubled psychologist studying her. In my series, avowed sceptic Dr Robert Bridge (Andrew Lincoln) is paralysed by the loss of his son, Josh. Alison Mundy (Lesley Sharp) can see him, but he himself cannot. Since ghosts are about presences but also absences, I find the symbolism of who can see and who is psychically “blind” one that returns to my writing again and again. What is gone is often as important as what remains. And if you can see nothing, does it really mean there is nothing there? As Alison says to Robert in Afterlife: “Who’s to say I’m mad and you’re sane?” And so to Baby on Board. Which first came to me as a short story idea, the catalyst being a request from Holly Blades for a late night ghost story to be read aloud at EdgeLit, the bijou genre convention at The Quad in Derby, upcoming in July 2023. As many genre writers will tell you, sometimes a creepy story is sparked by something quite innocuous in life. In this case, it was the ubiquitous sign or sticker you see on the rear windows of cars—"Baby on Board"—which somehow, to me, with its catchy alliteration, and its implication of a fragile cargo, has a sinister, or potentially sinister, ring to it. With the title firmly in mind, I pictured an empty baby seat, something we see every day with no attendant anxiety, imagining that the parent must have extracted said child for some undefined period of time after which the occupant would be returned. But what if that isn’t the case? What if the child is gone forever? Presences and absences. I wondered if I could use a baby seat as a totemic object and one to which a grieving father must cling. I knew of many instances (we probably all do) where a treasured possession or piece of clothing comes to symbolise a lost loved one and the bereaved person is understandably loath to part with it. This seemed one such instance, albeit an invented and bizarre one. The set-up of one father enduring loss meeting another, expectant, father in the dead of night struck me as an eerie one, but this tale needed to be about sadness; taking it in an overtly horror direction would have served to cheapen it, I felt, so I pulled back from that. No gag. No twist. When it comes to horror stories, I often ask myself: “What’s the least I have to do to make this horror?” And so it was written, and became accepted as part of a new collection—all ghost stories by me—which will be published later this year. Details TBC. It will also—as you know by now, dear reader—be a short film directed by the excellent Andrew David Barker. As soon as it was on the page I thought, this is basically a two-hander which could be realised on film without bursting anybody’s bank balance. I thought it was performable—not all stories are—and, importantly, I thought it might, for all its brevity, stick in the mind of the viewer if we got it right. In my opinion, many short films are beautifully produced but sometimes feel like show reels for the director’s next job. I wanted this to be a film the director wanted to make, not the next one. And so, it seems, it is. God knows, using the ghost to represent a projection of inner psychological turmoil isn’t new, but nevertheless it’s one of the most potent metaphors I know. Ultimately, I think, and hope, embedded in Baby on Board is something a little different in a supernatural story—if it is a supernatural story, even. The idea that hurt can be painful to the point of being unbearable, but to continue without that hurt, perceived as a kind of betrayal of the deceased, can be more unbearable still. Baby on Board: A Production Diary27/3/2023 Hosted by HorrfiedMag, Andrew David Barker will be writing a diary about the making of his next short film "Baby on Board" - based on a short story of mine, with a script adaptation by me. I hope this will be an exciting adventure and you can be with us every step of the way. Take it away, Andrew.
This is an ongoing production diary charting the making of the short film Baby On Board, written by Stephen Volk and directed by me, Andrew David Barker. With each entry, I will detail the production, from pre to post, and beyond. This will all be exclusive content to Horrified, and as we go on, it will include production stills, interviews, and more. I hope you will join me on this adventure and enjoy what’s to come. If you would like to support this project, I have a BUY ME A COFFEE page. Any contribution will go directly into the film and would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Andrew David Barker Follow Andrew's "Baby On Board" Production Diary here A short interview about ghost stories and writing, hosted by Mark Norman of The Folklore Podcast - recorded live at the 2023 UK Ghost Story Festival at the Museum of Making in Derby.
Film (Year) Director:
Don't Look Now (1973) dir. Nicolas Roeg The Innocents (1961) dir. Jack Clayton Taxi Driver (1976) dir. Martin Scorsese The Devils (1971) dir. Ken Russell Macbeth (1971) dir. Roman Polanski Picnic at Hanging Rock (1975) dir. Peter Weir Apocalypse Now (1979) dir. Francis Ford Coppola Requiem for a Dream (2000) dir. Darren Aronofsky The Night of the Hunter (1955) dir. Charles Laughton Dracula (1958) dir. Terence Fisher Don't Look Now 1973 United Kingdom, Italy This film had a profound and visceral effect on me and has been embedded in my psyche ever since. A masterpiece of every aspect of cinematic art. The Innocents 1961 USA, United Kingdom The most effective and precise rendition of a ghost story in cinema, with an unforgettable central performance. Taxi Driver 1976 USA The first film where I found myself experiencing an abnormal mind from the inside. Rewards endless rewatching. The Devils 1971 USA, United Kingdom A physical onslaught of a film which changed my idea about organised religion, and history, forever. I have never been the same since. The fact the film has not been released in its intended form is a travesty. Macbeth 1971 USA, United Kingdom Polanski achieved at a stroke what my English teachers never had: he made Shakespeare not only intelligible but compelling. Picnic at Hanging Rock 1975 Australia A film that is not just a mystery, but about the nature of mystery and the inability of human beings to accept the inexplicable. Masterful and eternally resonant. Apocalypse Now 1979 USA Far more than a war film or mythic quest, it throws of the shackles off its genre to become a meditation on madness and horror. Unforgettable. Requiem for a Dream 2000 USA Simply unrelenting and unapologetic. Funny, disturbing, extreme, challenging - all I ever want from cinema. The fact that some people find it unbearably grim only makes me love it all the more. The Night of the Hunter 1955 USA This nightmarish horror with children at the centre, full of classic imagery and a blood and thunder perforamance from Mitchum, always had to be on my list. Dracula 1958 United Kingdom There had to be one Hammer here, and it's this. There is no better scene in the history of horror than the climactic confrontation between Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee. Etched into my mind and absolutely treasured. It never gets old and never fails to get the blood pumping. Further remarks: I have chosen these films with two strict criteria: That they had to have had a profound effect on me on first viewing. Secondly, that their lasting legacy had to have stayed with me and imbued my own creative life. All the films on the list have done, some directly and massively influencing my writing, while others have provided constant inspiration by their greatness. Thanks for the opportunity to share them. Close, but no cigar: A Clockwork Orange They Shoot Horses, Don't They? The Devil Rides Out Quatermass and the Pit Stephen VolkScreenwriter and author Archives
January 2025
|